What's in it for us? This movie allows us to ask this
question about the quality of our actions in our own lives; Do my actions
in my life have the quality of acts of creation, or are my actions better
described as acts of maintenance?
How can we tell the difference?
Acts of creation, are motivated by clearly
imagined desires for our life. These acts intentionally move us toward the
fulfillment of those desires. A life like this demonstrates an anticipation
of and excitement about the coming results!
Acts of maintenance: There is no clearly
defined and desirable destination that is being moved towards. A life like
this doesn't demonstrate the anticipation and excitement of knowing that it
is moving towards the fulfillment of desires. Instead it reflects an uneasy
sense of striving to avoid what it doesn't want. In this kind of life
actions are chosen to maintain a distance from those things.
Imagine being in a car and taking a trip toward a very
exciting and desirable destination. This
trip has been planned far in advance, all of the details about the
excitement and pleasure that the experience of the chosen destination has to
offer, have been imagined again and again during the preparation of this
trip. How would it feel to be in that car? What would the facial expressions
be like? If there were more than one person in the car what would the
conversation sound like?
Now imagine traveling in a car without a chosen and
desirable destination in mind. Instead of
that, there is only a sense of where you don't want to be. All the driving
decisions are based upon the need to avoid places you don't want to be, but
never result in getting any closer to any place where you do want to be. How
does it feel to be in that car? What would the facial expression be like? If
there are more than one person in the car what with the conversation sound
like?
In Fearless the main character Max Klein was maintaining the absence of
fear. His new belief system and therefore his actions after surviving the
plane crash were not aligned with creativity. He focused all of his
attention on the saving of other people with no consideration for his own
needs or desires. In his recollection of the crash experience he remembers
himself, in the moments before impact, surrendering his fear of death.
Whether this is a real memory or imagined doesn't matter. What does matter
is what he chooses to do with it. In the days and weeks following the crash
he begins to formulate a new belief system that tell him that the absence of
fear was the very thing that allowed him to survive.
For survivor Max Klein, life now equaled the absence of
fear.
It became enough for him to avoid the presence of fear
rather than move toward the presence of that which he desired. His actions
became acts off maintenance rather than acts of creation. The absence of
fear represented life, rather than the experience and fulfillment of self
chosen goals and desires that were worthy of his pursuit.
This illustrates an age-old discussion about human existence and the
relationship between the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. The
discussion of this relationship and its significance is often way
oversimplified simply because in discussion we rarely reach beyond our
intellectual intelligences.
We are not just mind; we are mind, body, heart and
spirit.
In the formulation of our idea of a life worthy of living we
must access all of those components and the intelligence that they
represent. For example, in the pursuit of pleasure, is the pleasure worthy
of our pursuit, and why do we seek that pleasure? Do we seek it because it
offers us an opportunity to be a more complete and pure expression of
ourselves, or does it represent a need to distract us from a pain of another
sort, as in the seeking of some form of physical pleasures to avoid
emotional pain. It works for a short awhile, but the pain returns when the
pleasure is past. If we simply live in our minds then it would be enough to
formulate the opinions and belief systems that guide our actions in our
lives with just our intellect. But we don't just live in our minds. To be
whole, we are better served to access the intelligences of our entire being
to get a more complete guidance of what to choose for our lives. This is the
kind of oversimplification the Max Klein suffered in fearless. His new
belief system was entirely intellectual, a reaction to traumatic experience
of near-death. For Max Klein, life equaled the absence of fear, and so his
life became about the avoidance of it.
Look at other life on earth! If a plant stops growing, developing and
expanding, it's dying! If we stop growing developing and expanding in our
own lives we are not living at all, we're slowly dying as Max Klein was in
Fearless. In life, can we just avoid things we don't desire and call that a
life? We need to have worthy goals and desires that we're moving towards,
each action being one of creation toward the fulfillment of them. In the end
Max Klein saw the light, and instead of being the savior, he decided it was
he who needed saving.
Watch this film again and pay particular attention to the significance of
the strawberries. Remember early in the film, he tested his new belief
system and ate a bowl of strawberries when he knew he shouldn't. This was
not an act of creation. Max Klein was not moving toward a desire to enjoy
strawberries. Instead he was proving his new belief system, that the absence
of fear equals life.
Here's a little contest for all of you Seekers Guide to Great Movies
subscribers. Yes, like any good contest there is a prize! The first
response that I receive with a good answer, in line with what we have
discussed here, will receive a one-month subscription to Netflix!
I will send a follow-up e-mail to reveal the winner and the
winner's answer!
Be the first to answer this question, and watch all the DVDs
you can in 30 days for free! Send your answers to
mark@theseekersguide.com. Good luck, and remember, you are what you
watch!
Mark

The Seekers Guide, 140 Pine Street, Room 9,
Florence, Ma 01062
Phone: 413 303 0315
To Unsubscribe: